Donald Trump’s latest remarks targeting Canada have once again raised questions about his approach to foreign policy and his broader vision for the future of the United States on the global stage. While Canada has historically been one of America’s closest allies, Trump’s recent statements suggest that he is willing to take a more confrontational stance toward the neighboring country, a move that could signal a shift in how he views U.S. relations with other global partners as well.
Trump’s comments, which were made during a series of interviews and speeches, have centered on what he describes as Canada’s unfair trade practices and its handling of economic issues that he believes have negatively impacted the U.S. He has repeatedly criticized Canadian trade policies, particularly in the dairy and agricultural sectors, claiming that they harm American farmers and workers. These statements echo similar rhetoric he used during his presidency when he took aim at several trade agreements, including the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he sought to renegotiate and ultimately replaced with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
While the U.S.-Canada relationship has had its moments of tension, particularly under Trump’s leadership, these latest remarks signal a more aggressive posture. Critics argue that targeting Canada—traditionally a strong partner in trade, defense, and diplomacy—could damage the long-standing alliance between the two nations and set the stage for future conflict. However, Trump’s supporters may view this as part of his broader strategy to put America’s interests first, even if it means challenging long-established diplomatic norms.
But Trump’s rhetoric about Canada could be just the beginning. Many analysts believe that, as he continues to stake out his positions for a possible future presidential run, he may broaden his criticisms to include other allies and global institutions. His track record suggests that no country, even longtime allies, is off-limits if he perceives that they are not advancing American interests in ways he deems necessary. His comments about Canada could be seen as a way to demonstrate his willingness to take on international powers that he believes have benefited from U.S. generosity or weakness.
This "America First" mentality could have significant repercussions on U.S. foreign policy if Trump returns to office. His confrontational approach with Canada might be a harbinger of similar tactics toward the European Union, Japan, or other longstanding partners. While such rhetoric may rally his base, it also risks isolating the U.S. from important diplomatic and trade relationships that have helped maintain global stability and prosperity.
In conclusion, Trump’s ongoing criticisms of Canada could be a strategic move designed to solidify his position as a champion of American sovereignty and economic strength. However, this stance may be just the beginning of a broader campaign against not just Canada, but any country he perceives as challenging American interests in the global arena. As Trump’s political future continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether these remarks will reshape U.S. foreign policy or merely be another chapter in his controversial legacy.

 

Donald Trump’s latest remarks targeting Canada have once again raised questions about his approach to foreign policy and his broader vision for the future of the United States on the global stage. While Canada has historically been one of America’s closest allies, Trump’s recent statements suggest that he is willing to take a more confrontational stance toward the neighboring country, a move that could signal a shift in how he views U.S. relations with other global partners as well.
Trump’s comments, which were made during a series of interviews and speeches, have centered on what he describes as Canada’s unfair trade practices and its handling of economic issues that he believes have negatively impacted the U.S. He has repeatedly criticized Canadian trade policies, particularly in the dairy and agricultural sectors, claiming that they harm American farmers and workers. These statements echo similar rhetoric he used during his presidency when he took aim at several trade agreements, including the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he sought to renegotiate and ultimately replaced with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
While the U.S.-Canada relationship has had its moments of tension, particularly under Trump’s leadership, these latest remarks signal a more aggressive posture. Critics argue that targeting Canada—traditionally a strong partner in trade, defense, and diplomacy—could damage the long-standing alliance between the two nations and set the stage for future conflict. However, Trump’s supporters may view this as part of his broader strategy to put America’s interests first, even if it means challenging long-established diplomatic norms.
But Trump’s rhetoric about Canada could be just the beginning. Many analysts believe that, as he continues to stake out his positions for a possible future presidential run, he may broaden his criticisms to include other allies and global institutions. His track record suggests that no country, even longtime allies, is off-limits if he perceives that they are not advancing American interests in ways he deems necessary. His comments about Canada could be seen as a way to demonstrate his willingness to take on international powers that he believes have benefited from U.S. generosity or weakness.
This "America First" mentality could have significant repercussions on U.S. foreign policy if Trump returns to office. His confrontational approach with Canada might be a harbinger of similar tactics toward the European Union, Japan, or other longstanding partners. While such rhetoric may rally his base, it also risks isolating the U.S. from important diplomatic and trade relationships that have helped maintain global stability and prosperity.
In conclusion, Trump’s ongoing criticisms of Canada could be a strategic move designed to solidify his position as a champion of American sovereignty and economic strength. However, this stance may be just the beginning of a broader campaign against not just Canada, but any country he perceives as challenging American interests in the global arena. As Trump’s political future continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether these remarks will reshape U.S. foreign policy or merely be another chapter in his controversial legacy.

 

Former President Donald Trump has recently sparked a wave of speculation by teasing potential U.S. expansion into foreign territories, specifically Panama, Greenland, and Canada. These remarks, made in public statements and on social media, have reignited discussions about the future of American geopolitical ambitions and the nature of U.S. foreign policy under his influence. While Trump has a long history of making bold, often controversial statements, his comments about expansionism have raised eyebrows, leading to a flurry of responses from political analysts, diplomats, and the public alike.
Trump's comments first surfaced when he hinted at the possibility of acquiring territories like Panama and Greenland, territories that have long held strategic importance for the U.S. during his presidency and beyond. Panama, with its crucial position as the home to the Panama Canal, has been of great strategic interest to the U.S. for more than a century. The canal is a vital maritime link between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, making Panama a key geopolitical asset. While Trump has never explicitly advocated for the annexation of Panama, his past comments about acquiring Greenland—an idea he floated during his presidency—add a layer of intrigue to his remarks. Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, is rich in natural resources, and its proximity to the Arctic has made it an area of increasing geopolitical competition in recent years.
Equally notable are his remarks about Canada, which, while an ally and partner in many respects, has had moments of friction with the U.S. under Trump’s leadership. Though Trump did not make direct claims of wanting to annex Canada, his teasing of such an idea appears to be part of his broader rhetoric of pushing the boundaries of traditional diplomatic norms. Some have speculated that Trump’s comments could be designed to stoke nationalistic fervor or to position himself as a bold figure willing to entertain unconventional ideas in order to "make America greater."
While these remarks have stirred conversation, it’s important to recognize that they are likely more rhetoric than serious policy proposals. International law, existing treaties, and the political realities of sovereign nations make such territorial acquisitions highly improbable. Nonetheless, Trump’s comments reflect a certain strain of American exceptionalism and manifest destiny thinking that has periodically resurfaced throughout U.S. history. Whether or not these ideas are ever seriously pursued, Trump’s teasing of U.S. expansion underscores his penchant for stirring the pot and pushing the boundaries of political discourse. As with many of his past statements, the true impact of his remarks remains to be seen.

 

Former President Donald Trump has recently sparked a wave of speculation by teasing potential U.S. expansion into foreign territories, specifically Panama, Greenland, and Canada. These remarks, made in public statements and on social media, have reignited discussions about the future of American geopolitical ambitions and the nature of U.S. foreign policy under his influence. While Trump has a long history of making bold, often controversial statements, his comments about expansionism have raised eyebrows, leading to a flurry of responses from political analysts, diplomats, and the public alike.
Trump's comments first surfaced when he hinted at the possibility of acquiring territories like Panama and Greenland, territories that have long held strategic importance for the U.S. during his presidency and beyond. Panama, with its crucial position as the home to the Panama Canal, has been of great strategic interest to the U.S. for more than a century. The canal is a vital maritime link between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, making Panama a key geopolitical asset. While Trump has never explicitly advocated for the annexation of Panama, his past comments about acquiring Greenland—an idea he floated during his presidency—add a layer of intrigue to his remarks. Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, is rich in natural resources, and its proximity to the Arctic has made it an area of increasing geopolitical competition in recent years.
Equally notable are his remarks about Canada, which, while an ally and partner in many respects, has had moments of friction with the U.S. under Trump’s leadership. Though Trump did not make direct claims of wanting to annex Canada, his teasing of such an idea appears to be part of his broader rhetoric of pushing the boundaries of traditional diplomatic norms. Some have speculated that Trump’s comments could be designed to stoke nationalistic fervor or to position himself as a bold figure willing to entertain unconventional ideas in order to "make America greater."
While these remarks have stirred conversation, it’s important to recognize that they are likely more rhetoric than serious policy proposals. International law, existing treaties, and the political realities of sovereign nations make such territorial acquisitions highly improbable. Nonetheless, Trump’s comments reflect a certain strain of American exceptionalism and manifest destiny thinking that has periodically resurfaced throughout U.S. history. Whether or not these ideas are ever seriously pursued, Trump’s teasing of U.S. expansion underscores his penchant for stirring the pot and pushing the boundaries of political discourse. As with many of his past statements, the true impact of his remarks remains to be seen.

Democrats need to net four seats to flip the Senate in two years, a tall order with just one Republican running in a state Kamala Harris carried in November.

In the upcoming midterm elections, Democrats face a challenging path to flipping the Senate, with a need to net at least four seats in order to gain control. This goal has become especially difficult considering the current political landscape, where the opportunities for Democrats are limited and the Republicans have a solid foothold in several key states. One of the most notable hurdles for Democrats is that only one Republican is running in a state that Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the November election—a situation that dramatically tightens the pool of viable targets for Democratic challengers.

To understand the significance of this challenge, it’s important to recognize the structure of the Senate. With 100 seats, the Senate is currently controlled by Republicans, and the Democrats need to win four additional seats in order to flip it. However, for Democrats to successfully flip these seats, they must navigate a series of complex factors: historical trends, redistricting, and the fact that many of the most competitive Senate races are taking place in states that have recently leaned Republican. This means the Democrats must rely heavily on states that Biden won in 2020, but where Senate races may still heavily favor the GOP.

In states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, which were crucial for President Biden’s victory in 2020, Democrats could potentially make inroads. But the math is tight, and many of these states also have incumbent Republican senators with strong backing. For instance, the fact that only one Republican senator is running in a state Kamala Harris carried in the previous election—such as Arizona, where Democratic Senator Mark Kelly is facing a tough re-election challenge—shows just how limited the opportunities are. While Arizona and a few other battleground states offer some hope, the limited number of Republican-held seats in states Biden won means that flipping the Senate is far from guaranteed.

This uphill battle reflects a broader trend in American politics, where Senate races often don’t align neatly with presidential voting patterns. Midterm elections typically see a drop-off in the party holding the presidency, and while Democrats may have momentum in certain areas, they’ll have to overcome significant challenges to expand their majority. In conclusion, while flipping the Senate is a lofty goal, the path to doing so is narrow and fraught with political obstacles, requiring Democrats to win in highly competitive races with few opportunities for growth.

Democrats need to net four seats to flip the Senate in two years, a tall order with just one Republican running in a state Kamala Harris carried in November.

In the upcoming midterm elections, Democrats face a challenging path to flipping the Senate, with a need to net at least four seats in order to gain control. This goal has become especially difficult considering the current political landscape, where the opportunities for Democrats are limited and the Republicans have a solid foothold in several key states. One of the most notable hurdles for Democrats is that only one Republican is running in a state that Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the November election—a situation that dramatically tightens the pool of viable targets for Democratic challengers.

To understand the significance of this challenge, it’s important to recognize the structure of the Senate. With 100 seats, the Senate is currently controlled by Republicans, and the Democrats need to win four additional seats in order to flip it. However, for Democrats to successfully flip these seats, they must navigate a series of complex factors: historical trends, redistricting, and the fact that many of the most competitive Senate races are taking place in states that have recently leaned Republican. This means the Democrats must rely heavily on states that Biden won in 2020, but where Senate races may still heavily favor the GOP.

In states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, which were crucial for President Biden’s victory in 2020, Democrats could potentially make inroads. But the math is tight, and many of these states also have incumbent Republican senators with strong backing. For instance, the fact that only one Republican senator is running in a state Kamala Harris carried in the previous election—such as Arizona, where Democratic Senator Mark Kelly is facing a tough re-election challenge—shows just how limited the opportunities are. While Arizona and a few other battleground states offer some hope, the limited number of Republican-held seats in states Biden won means that flipping the Senate is far from guaranteed.

This uphill battle reflects a broader trend in American politics, where Senate races often don’t align neatly with presidential voting patterns. Midterm elections typically see a drop-off in the party holding the presidency, and while Democrats may have momentum in certain areas, they’ll have to overcome significant challenges to expand their majority. In conclusion, while flipping the Senate is a lofty goal, the path to doing so is narrow and fraught with political obstacles, requiring Democrats to win in highly competitive races with few opportunities for growth.

 Footage recently supplied by Peru’s national police agency has captured a curious and unusual scene: a man dressed as the Grinch, but with a twist. Instead of his usual mischievous green fur, this Grinch figure is sporting Santa Claus’ iconic red jacket. The strange sight took place in the streets of southern Lima, where the character, holding a sledgehammer over his shoulder, was seen running down the road in a hurry. The incident has quickly caught the attention of both local authorities and the public, sparking intrigue and confusion across the city.

In the video, the figure dressed in the unconventional mix of Grinch and Santa attire moves with urgency, suggesting something more than a simple holiday prank. The man’s unusual appearance—combining the festive red of Santa’s coat with the Grinch’s mischievous persona—raises questions about his intentions. The sledgehammer, an unconventional accessory for a holiday costume, adds to the mystery. While the Grinch character is typically associated with causing mischief, the presence of a sledgehammer hints at the possibility of a more serious or threatening situation.

Peruvian authorities have yet to provide detailed information about the man’s motives or whether he was involved in any criminal activity. The footage has sparked a wide array of reactions from the public. Some have speculated that it could have been a performance art piece or a strange prank, while others fear it may have been a prelude to a robbery or other criminal act. The police have not confirmed any links to criminal activity as of yet, though the video continues to make its rounds on social media, with many viewers expressing shock at the bizarre image.

While it’s not entirely uncommon to see eccentric holiday costumes in public, the combination of Grinch and Santa’s jacket paired with the sledgehammer gives this particular sighting an edge of suspense and unpredictability. Authorities have urged anyone with additional information to come forward, and are reportedly continuing their investigation into the incident.

As this strange footage circulates, it serves as a reminder of the odd and often unpredictable nature of public behavior, especially during the festive season. The Grinch's appearance, though initially amusing, has left many wondering if there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

 Footage recently supplied by Peru’s national police agency has captured a curious and unusual scene: a man dressed as the Grinch, but with a twist. Instead of his usual mischievous green fur, this Grinch figure is sporting Santa Claus’ iconic red jacket. The strange sight took place in the streets of southern Lima, where the character, holding a sledgehammer over his shoulder, was seen running down the road in a hurry. The incident has quickly caught the attention of both local authorities and the public, sparking intrigue and confusion across the city.

In the video, the figure dressed in the unconventional mix of Grinch and Santa attire moves with urgency, suggesting something more than a simple holiday prank. The man’s unusual appearance—combining the festive red of Santa’s coat with the Grinch’s mischievous persona—raises questions about his intentions. The sledgehammer, an unconventional accessory for a holiday costume, adds to the mystery. While the Grinch character is typically associated with causing mischief, the presence of a sledgehammer hints at the possibility of a more serious or threatening situation.

Peruvian authorities have yet to provide detailed information about the man’s motives or whether he was involved in any criminal activity. The footage has sparked a wide array of reactions from the public. Some have speculated that it could have been a performance art piece or a strange prank, while others fear it may have been a prelude to a robbery or other criminal act. The police have not confirmed any links to criminal activity as of yet, though the video continues to make its rounds on social media, with many viewers expressing shock at the bizarre image.

While it’s not entirely uncommon to see eccentric holiday costumes in public, the combination of Grinch and Santa’s jacket paired with the sledgehammer gives this particular sighting an edge of suspense and unpredictability. Authorities have urged anyone with additional information to come forward, and are reportedly continuing their investigation into the incident.

As this strange footage circulates, it serves as a reminder of the odd and often unpredictable nature of public behavior, especially during the festive season. The Grinch's appearance, though initially amusing, has left many wondering if there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

 

An Ivy League-educated suspect is facing charges in connection with the shocking murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was gunned down on a bustling sidewalk in Midtown Manhattan. The attack, which occurred in broad daylight, has left the city and the business world in disbelief, given the prominence of the victim and the seemingly unprovoked nature of the crime.

According to law enforcement, the suspect, identified as a highly educated individual with a degree from one of the Ivy League universities, allegedly approached Thompson on the sidewalk and fired multiple shots. The motive for the murder remains unclear, but investigators are exploring several theories, including personal or professional animosities. Witnesses reported seeing the suspect flee the scene shortly after the shooting, and police were quick to launch a massive manhunt.

Thompson, a seasoned executive who had led UnitedHealthcare for several years, was widely regarded as a transformative figure in the healthcare industry. Under his leadership, the company expanded its reach and solidified its position as one of the largest healthcare providers in the United States. His sudden death has not only shaken the healthcare community but also left a void in a company he helped steer to new heights.

The suspect’s background has raised eyebrows, with many wondering how someone with such an accomplished academic history could be linked to such a violent act. The details of the suspect’s previous life, including career and personal history, are still under investigation. However, experts suggest that this tragedy could point to deeper issues, such as mental health struggles or hidden grievances, that are not immediately apparent.

As the investigation unfolds, authorities are working to uncover the full extent of what led to Thompson's tragic death. Meanwhile, tributes from colleagues, business leaders, and the healthcare community continue to pour in, honoring Thompson’s legacy and expressing shock at the senseless violence.

 

An Ivy League-educated suspect is facing charges in connection with the shocking murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was gunned down on a bustling sidewalk in Midtown Manhattan. The attack, which occurred in broad daylight, has left the city and the business world in disbelief, given the prominence of the victim and the seemingly unprovoked nature of the crime.

According to law enforcement, the suspect, identified as a highly educated individual with a degree from one of the Ivy League universities, allegedly approached Thompson on the sidewalk and fired multiple shots. The motive for the murder remains unclear, but investigators are exploring several theories, including personal or professional animosities. Witnesses reported seeing the suspect flee the scene shortly after the shooting, and police were quick to launch a massive manhunt.

Thompson, a seasoned executive who had led UnitedHealthcare for several years, was widely regarded as a transformative figure in the healthcare industry. Under his leadership, the company expanded its reach and solidified its position as one of the largest healthcare providers in the United States. His sudden death has not only shaken the healthcare community but also left a void in a company he helped steer to new heights.

The suspect’s background has raised eyebrows, with many wondering how someone with such an accomplished academic history could be linked to such a violent act. The details of the suspect’s previous life, including career and personal history, are still under investigation. However, experts suggest that this tragedy could point to deeper issues, such as mental health struggles or hidden grievances, that are not immediately apparent.

As the investigation unfolds, authorities are working to uncover the full extent of what led to Thompson's tragic death. Meanwhile, tributes from colleagues, business leaders, and the healthcare community continue to pour in, honoring Thompson’s legacy and expressing shock at the senseless violence.

 

Tampa Bay's recent loss has significantly impacted its position in the AFC South, dropping the team to second place behind the Atlanta Falcons. The setback comes at a critical point in the season, as both teams are vying for playoff contention. The Buccaneers' defeat, which occurred in a tough, hard-fought game, has left them with a narrow gap to close if they are to reclaim the division lead.

Despite a promising start to the season, Tampa Bay's performance in the game was marred by key turnovers and missed opportunities. Quarterback struggles and a lackluster offensive performance contributed to the loss, leaving the team unable to capitalize on their usual strength. While the defense showed flashes of brilliance, they ultimately couldn't stop the opposing offense from making critical plays when it mattered most.

The loss dropped Tampa Bay to a 7-6 record, with the Falcons now holding the top spot in the AFC South with a 8-5 record. The Falcons’ solid win put them in a favorable position to extend their lead and maintain control of the division, while the Buccaneers are now in a must-win situation in their upcoming games to stay within striking distance.

This defeat has placed extra pressure on Tampa Bay in the final stretch of the regular season. With only a few games remaining, the team’s playoff hopes are still very much alive, but their margin for error is growing smaller with each passing week. Head coach Todd Bowles and his staff will need to regroup and make adjustments to ensure the team remains competitive in the race for the division title.

As the AFC South division continues to tighten, the battle for supremacy between the Buccaneers and Falcons promises to be one of the most exciting storylines in the remainder of the NFL season.

 

Tampa Bay's recent loss has significantly impacted its position in the AFC South, dropping the team to second place behind the Atlanta Falcons. The setback comes at a critical point in the season, as both teams are vying for playoff contention. The Buccaneers' defeat, which occurred in a tough, hard-fought game, has left them with a narrow gap to close if they are to reclaim the division lead.

Despite a promising start to the season, Tampa Bay's performance in the game was marred by key turnovers and missed opportunities. Quarterback struggles and a lackluster offensive performance contributed to the loss, leaving the team unable to capitalize on their usual strength. While the defense showed flashes of brilliance, they ultimately couldn't stop the opposing offense from making critical plays when it mattered most.

The loss dropped Tampa Bay to a 7-6 record, with the Falcons now holding the top spot in the AFC South with a 8-5 record. The Falcons’ solid win put them in a favorable position to extend their lead and maintain control of the division, while the Buccaneers are now in a must-win situation in their upcoming games to stay within striking distance.

This defeat has placed extra pressure on Tampa Bay in the final stretch of the regular season. With only a few games remaining, the team’s playoff hopes are still very much alive, but their margin for error is growing smaller with each passing week. Head coach Todd Bowles and his staff will need to regroup and make adjustments to ensure the team remains competitive in the race for the division title.

As the AFC South division continues to tighten, the battle for supremacy between the Buccaneers and Falcons promises to be one of the most exciting storylines in the remainder of the NFL season.

 An Ivy League-educated suspect is currently facing charges in connection with the shooting death of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was tragically killed on a Midtown Manhattan sidewalk. The incident, which occurred during daylight hours, has left both the business world and the public in shock, as Thompson, a well-respected leader in the healthcare industry, was shot and killed in an unexpected act of violence.

According to authorities, the suspect, whose background includes a prestigious education from one of the Ivy League universities, is accused of carrying out the attack in a calculated and deliberate manner. The shooting took place in a highly trafficked area of Midtown, adding to the gravity of the situation. Witnesses reported seeing the suspect approach Thompson before firing several rounds, leaving the CEO to collapse on the sidewalk.

While the motive behind the attack remains unclear, investigators are exploring various possible angles. Early reports suggest that there may have been personal or professional grievances involved, although authorities have not yet disclosed specific details. The suspect's background and education have raised questions, as it contrasts with the typical profile of individuals involved in such violent crimes.

Thompson, who had led UnitedHealthcare for several years, was widely regarded as a transformative figure in the healthcare sector. Under his leadership, the company expanded its reach and solidified its position as one of the largest and most influential healthcare providers in the United States. His untimely death has left a void in the company, and tributes have poured in from colleagues and business leaders alike, all expressing their shock and sorrow.

The investigation into Thompson's death is ongoing, with law enforcement working diligently to uncover the details behind the tragic event. As more information comes to light, the public remains on edge, seeking answers to why such a well-educated individual would allegedly resort to such an extreme and violent act.

 An Ivy League-educated suspect is currently facing charges in connection with the shooting death of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was tragically killed on a Midtown Manhattan sidewalk. The incident, which occurred during daylight hours, has left both the business world and the public in shock, as Thompson, a well-respected leader in the healthcare industry, was shot and killed in an unexpected act of violence.

According to authorities, the suspect, whose background includes a prestigious education from one of the Ivy League universities, is accused of carrying out the attack in a calculated and deliberate manner. The shooting took place in a highly trafficked area of Midtown, adding to the gravity of the situation. Witnesses reported seeing the suspect approach Thompson before firing several rounds, leaving the CEO to collapse on the sidewalk.

While the motive behind the attack remains unclear, investigators are exploring various possible angles. Early reports suggest that there may have been personal or professional grievances involved, although authorities have not yet disclosed specific details. The suspect's background and education have raised questions, as it contrasts with the typical profile of individuals involved in such violent crimes.

Thompson, who had led UnitedHealthcare for several years, was widely regarded as a transformative figure in the healthcare sector. Under his leadership, the company expanded its reach and solidified its position as one of the largest and most influential healthcare providers in the United States. His untimely death has left a void in the company, and tributes have poured in from colleagues and business leaders alike, all expressing their shock and sorrow.

The investigation into Thompson's death is ongoing, with law enforcement working diligently to uncover the details behind the tragic event. As more information comes to light, the public remains on edge, seeking answers to why such a well-educated individual would allegedly resort to such an extreme and violent act.

 

Nets forward Trendon Watford will not play against the Toronto Raptors on Thursday at Scotiabank Arena after suffering a left hamstring injury in the first half of Monday’s 130-101 loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Watford contributed eight points on 2-for-3 shooting (3-for-3 at the free throw line) before he was ruled out at halftime. Brooklyn announced that he was dealing with left hamstring soreness. The 24-year-old missed the entire preseason and the first 13 games of the regular season because of a left hamstring strain.

Nets head coach Jordi Fernandez said that Watford will undergo a full evaluation following Thursday’s game to determine the context of his latest injury.

“We will let you guys know a timetable when we know it,” Fernandez told reporters following Wednesday’s practice in Brooklyn. “Not to my knowledge when it happened. I’m pretty sure our medical team knows but it’s being addressed now. So, we’ll have that evaluation.”

Watford is averaging 8.3 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 1.2 assists through his first 13 games this season while shooting 44.3% from the field and 30.8% from 3-point range. He signed a one-year deal to remain with the Nets in July.

In a 116-115 defeat of the Charlotte Hornets on Nov. 19, Watford scored seven straight points in the fourth quarter to assist Brooklyn’s late rally. At the time, it was his second appearance of the season off the bench.

For now, Watford joins Cam Thomas (left hamstring strain), Ziaire Williams (left knee sprain) on the Nets’ injury report. Thursday will mark nine straight games missed for Thomas, and sixth straight for Williams. Fernandez said that Thomas and Williams are both progressing in their rehab, but there is still no timetable for when they will return to the court.

“It’s tough to always start out strong and then have an injury like this,” Thomas said when asked about his injury on Dec. 4. “It’s similar to last year with my ankle, you know, had a great start and then you out for a little bit, then you got to get your rhythm back. But I mean, overall, I feel I had a good start this season so far but definitely want to pick it up and be better when I do come back and get back on the floor.”

Brooklyn fell to 10-16 following Monday’s loss and had dropped three straight and five of six entering Thursday’s game. After its matchup with the Raptors, it will finish December with two home games against the Utah Jazz and San Antonio Spurs, and three road games against the Miami Heat, Milwaukee Bucks and Orlando Magic.

Whether Watford, Thomas or Williams will play in any of those games remains to be seen.

 

Nets forward Trendon Watford will not play against the Toronto Raptors on Thursday at Scotiabank Arena after suffering a left hamstring injury in the first half of Monday’s 130-101 loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Watford contributed eight points on 2-for-3 shooting (3-for-3 at the free throw line) before he was ruled out at halftime. Brooklyn announced that he was dealing with left hamstring soreness. The 24-year-old missed the entire preseason and the first 13 games of the regular season because of a left hamstring strain.

Nets head coach Jordi Fernandez said that Watford will undergo a full evaluation following Thursday’s game to determine the context of his latest injury.

“We will let you guys know a timetable when we know it,” Fernandez told reporters following Wednesday’s practice in Brooklyn. “Not to my knowledge when it happened. I’m pretty sure our medical team knows but it’s being addressed now. So, we’ll have that evaluation.”

Watford is averaging 8.3 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 1.2 assists through his first 13 games this season while shooting 44.3% from the field and 30.8% from 3-point range. He signed a one-year deal to remain with the Nets in July.

In a 116-115 defeat of the Charlotte Hornets on Nov. 19, Watford scored seven straight points in the fourth quarter to assist Brooklyn’s late rally. At the time, it was his second appearance of the season off the bench.

For now, Watford joins Cam Thomas (left hamstring strain), Ziaire Williams (left knee sprain) on the Nets’ injury report. Thursday will mark nine straight games missed for Thomas, and sixth straight for Williams. Fernandez said that Thomas and Williams are both progressing in their rehab, but there is still no timetable for when they will return to the court.

“It’s tough to always start out strong and then have an injury like this,” Thomas said when asked about his injury on Dec. 4. “It’s similar to last year with my ankle, you know, had a great start and then you out for a little bit, then you got to get your rhythm back. But I mean, overall, I feel I had a good start this season so far but definitely want to pick it up and be better when I do come back and get back on the floor.”

Brooklyn fell to 10-16 following Monday’s loss and had dropped three straight and five of six entering Thursday’s game. After its matchup with the Raptors, it will finish December with two home games against the Utah Jazz and San Antonio Spurs, and three road games against the Miami Heat, Milwaukee Bucks and Orlando Magic.

Whether Watford, Thomas or Williams will play in any of those games remains to be seen.

A hunter has died days after a bear fell out of a tree on top of him, Virginia wildlife authorities said Tuesday.

Lester Harvey Jr., 58, was among a group of hunters who chased the bear up a tree on Dec. 9, the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources told the Daily News in a statement.
As the group of hunters retreated from the base of the tree, one of them shot the bear, the department said. The bear fell out of the tree and landed squarely on Harvey, who was standing about 10 feet away. Among the witnesses were his adult son Josh Harvey, who said on social media he was hunting with his dad that day.
Fellow hunters rendered first aid until first responders arrived and rushed Lester Harvey first to a hospital in nearby South Hill, Va., and then to another one about 80 miles away in Richmond.
No charges are expected in the incident, which authorities classified as a hunting accident.
The avid outdoorsman and self-employed contractor was remembered in an obituary as “a friend to all” who “never met a stranger.”
“Dad was doing what he loved most, bear hunting with me and some of his good friends,” Josh Harvey wrote in a Facebook post two days after the accident.
In addition to Josh and four other children, Lester Harvey is survived by his wife and eight grandchildren, the obituary noted.

He was at first listed in serious but stable condition, KSBY reported. But on Friday, Dec. 13, “Harvey succumbed to his injuries,” Virginia wildlife officials said.

A hunter has died days after a bear fell out of a tree on top of him, Virginia wildlife authorities said Tuesday.

Lester Harvey Jr., 58, was among a group of hunters who chased the bear up a tree on Dec. 9, the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources told the Daily News in a statement.
As the group of hunters retreated from the base of the tree, one of them shot the bear, the department said. The bear fell out of the tree and landed squarely on Harvey, who was standing about 10 feet away. Among the witnesses were his adult son Josh Harvey, who said on social media he was hunting with his dad that day.
Fellow hunters rendered first aid until first responders arrived and rushed Lester Harvey first to a hospital in nearby South Hill, Va., and then to another one about 80 miles away in Richmond.
No charges are expected in the incident, which authorities classified as a hunting accident.
The avid outdoorsman and self-employed contractor was remembered in an obituary as “a friend to all” who “never met a stranger.”
“Dad was doing what he loved most, bear hunting with me and some of his good friends,” Josh Harvey wrote in a Facebook post two days after the accident.
In addition to Josh and four other children, Lester Harvey is survived by his wife and eight grandchildren, the obituary noted.

He was at first listed in serious but stable condition, KSBY reported. But on Friday, Dec. 13, “Harvey succumbed to his injuries,” Virginia wildlife officials said.

 2 New Jersey men convicted of killing honor roll student with autism

Two New Jersey men have been convicted in the 2021 killing of Yahsinn Robinson, a high school senior and honor roll student with autism, who they mistook as member of a rival gang, officials announced.
After a months-long trial and just several hours of deliberation, jurors found Kavon Carter and Sylas Young guilty of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, gang criminality, possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose and unlawful possession of a weapon, according to a statement released by the Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office late Wednesday. Carter was additionally convicted on counts of promoting organized street crime and certain persons not to have a weapon.
The charges stem from the slaying of 18-year-old Robinson on the April 22, 2021. A senior at Woodrow Wilson High School, Robinson was walking home from his part-time job when he was gunned down in his driveway around 11:30 p.m. that night.
Police said Carter and Young both fired off several rounds at the teen in a case of mistaken identity. An investigation revealed the men “and their associates from Pemberton Township had been involved in a long-running dispute with certain residents of the Buckingham Park section of Willingboro,” the prosecutor’s office said, adding that tensions between the rival groups had escalated in the days leading up to the shooting.

Robinson was not involved in the conflict in anyway, authorities said.

His mother, Saleenah Bell, described Robinson, who was on the autism spectrum, as a teddy bear and dedicated student. She mourned the fact that after all his hard work, he would never graduate or wear his cap and gown.

The loss is especially “difficult because this is what we worked for, she told CBS News.

“I hope that these people understand the hurt and pain they caused.”

 2 New Jersey men convicted of killing honor roll student with autism

Two New Jersey men have been convicted in the 2021 killing of Yahsinn Robinson, a high school senior and honor roll student with autism, who they mistook as member of a rival gang, officials announced.
After a months-long trial and just several hours of deliberation, jurors found Kavon Carter and Sylas Young guilty of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, gang criminality, possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose and unlawful possession of a weapon, according to a statement released by the Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office late Wednesday. Carter was additionally convicted on counts of promoting organized street crime and certain persons not to have a weapon.
The charges stem from the slaying of 18-year-old Robinson on the April 22, 2021. A senior at Woodrow Wilson High School, Robinson was walking home from his part-time job when he was gunned down in his driveway around 11:30 p.m. that night.
Police said Carter and Young both fired off several rounds at the teen in a case of mistaken identity. An investigation revealed the men “and their associates from Pemberton Township had been involved in a long-running dispute with certain residents of the Buckingham Park section of Willingboro,” the prosecutor’s office said, adding that tensions between the rival groups had escalated in the days leading up to the shooting.

Robinson was not involved in the conflict in anyway, authorities said.

His mother, Saleenah Bell, described Robinson, who was on the autism spectrum, as a teddy bear and dedicated student. She mourned the fact that after all his hard work, he would never graduate or wear his cap and gown.

The loss is especially “difficult because this is what we worked for, she told CBS News.

“I hope that these people understand the hurt and pain they caused.”

Immigration advocates gear up to fight Trump promises in places that voted for him

In red states and border counties, lawyers are preparing for war against deportation policies that many relatives and neighbors support. They just don't know "where the battle will be yet."

McALLEN, Texas — Inside the brightly lit law offices here of immigration attorney Alex Martinez, the front desk has been buzzing with activity.

Positioned on a quiet street corner just 8 miles north of the bridge that separates the U.S. and Mexico, the law firm has seen a notable uptick in phone calls and in-person visits from people looking for an immigration attorney.

Here in Hidalgo County, where President-elect Donald Trump won by just under 3 percentage points last month, many of those customers say they or their family members voted for him.

Until this year, Hidalgo County hadn’t voted Republican for president since 1972. Now, it’s one of 14 counties on or near the border that voted for Trump — many for the first time in decades as well.

“They believe that he is good for business,” Martinez said. “It seems to be more important that they have money coming into the family than them securing a legal status or not being removed.”

In the 35 states that a 2022 Pew Research Center report identified as having undocumented immigrant populations above 50,000, more than half went for Trump this election. This leaves immigrant rights groups, immigration attorneys and undocumented immigrants in those states in a difficult position: gearing up to fight upcoming immigration policies espoused by Trump, supported by a majority of voters in their region.

Kelli Stump, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, has seen the phenomenon firsthand, along with many of her organization’s nearly 16,000 member attorneys. Based in Oklahoma, a state where Trump won every county, Stump said a “significant” number of her clients either voted for Trump or have family members who did. 

“They don’t believe that Trump is going to deport their family member. Trump is going to deport the criminal or the person who just came across the border recently, Stump said, “They think that their family member might be safe.”

Through email chains and social media, she sees fellow attorneys doing their best to get ahead of potentially drastic changes to immigration enforcement, including the deportation of whole families and an end to birthright citizenship, both of which Trump reiterated as policy goals in an interview on NBC’s "Meet the Press" earlier this month.

“We are gearing up for the war. We just don’t know where the battle is going to be yet,” Stump said.

In the town of San Juan, just 15 minutes east of McAllen, organizers with La Unión del Pueblo Entero (LUPE), an immigration advocacy group, say they’re preparing in similar ways.

Joaquín García, the organization’s director of community organizing, said he’s noticed more fear and uncertainty in this border community since the election, especially after Trump’s suggestion that entire families could be deported together, regardless of their immigration status. 

“People hear that, and they are in fear. I’ve had people tell me, ‘What’s gonna happen?’ Or ‘I became naturalized a couple of years ago. Are they gonna come after me? Am I still at risk?’" García said. “We’re also telling people, if you’re a U.S. resident, maybe you should consider applying for U.S. citizenship to have a little more protection, but now we don’t even know if that protection will still be something that’s going to safeguard you from being deported to a country that maybe you’ve never been in.'”

García's organization is one of several across the country that are either hosting or planning to launch “know your rights” information sessions for the public, including Siembra NC in North Carolina, Project New Yorker in Queens and the UNLV Immigration Clinic in Nevada. In Kansas City, Missouri, immigration attorneys have begun passing out “red cards” that list residents’ rights should they be approached by immigration officials. 

García said he’s been advising families to keep an easily accessible cache of documents somewhere in their homes in case of a removal order. That file would contain money, evidence that they’ve been living in the U.S. and paying taxes, their birth certificate from their country of origin and — if they have children who are U.S. citizens — power of attorney that allows someone to act on their parents’ behalf in legal matters in case the parents are deported.

That’s exactly the kind of precaution Maria, whose last name is being withheld because of her undocumented immigration status, is working on now.

Maria left her home country 18 years ago, leaving her then-infant son with extended family to earn a living doing farm work in the U.S. Since then, she and her husband had twin daughters, who are now in their teens and are U.S. citizens. She pays LUPE $40 a year for access to legal and other services in Hidalgo County. 

She has been paying attention to the incoming president’s words through news reports and social media.

“Now we are more than scared, we are frightened, tortured, day after day,” she said in Spanish.

She said her family doesn't ask for anything — "we know how to live with very little" — but she has one request to the incoming Trump administration: that her family be allowed to stay together, so her daughters can have a better life in the country where they were born.

Immigration advocates gear up to fight Trump promises in places that voted for him

In red states and border counties, lawyers are preparing for war against deportation policies that many relatives and neighbors support. They just don't know "where the battle will be yet."

McALLEN, Texas — Inside the brightly lit law offices here of immigration attorney Alex Martinez, the front desk has been buzzing with activity.

Positioned on a quiet street corner just 8 miles north of the bridge that separates the U.S. and Mexico, the law firm has seen a notable uptick in phone calls and in-person visits from people looking for an immigration attorney.

Here in Hidalgo County, where President-elect Donald Trump won by just under 3 percentage points last month, many of those customers say they or their family members voted for him.

Until this year, Hidalgo County hadn’t voted Republican for president since 1972. Now, it’s one of 14 counties on or near the border that voted for Trump — many for the first time in decades as well.

“They believe that he is good for business,” Martinez said. “It seems to be more important that they have money coming into the family than them securing a legal status or not being removed.”

In the 35 states that a 2022 Pew Research Center report identified as having undocumented immigrant populations above 50,000, more than half went for Trump this election. This leaves immigrant rights groups, immigration attorneys and undocumented immigrants in those states in a difficult position: gearing up to fight upcoming immigration policies espoused by Trump, supported by a majority of voters in their region.

Kelli Stump, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, has seen the phenomenon firsthand, along with many of her organization’s nearly 16,000 member attorneys. Based in Oklahoma, a state where Trump won every county, Stump said a “significant” number of her clients either voted for Trump or have family members who did. 

“They don’t believe that Trump is going to deport their family member. Trump is going to deport the criminal or the person who just came across the border recently, Stump said, “They think that their family member might be safe.”

Through email chains and social media, she sees fellow attorneys doing their best to get ahead of potentially drastic changes to immigration enforcement, including the deportation of whole families and an end to birthright citizenship, both of which Trump reiterated as policy goals in an interview on NBC’s "Meet the Press" earlier this month.

“We are gearing up for the war. We just don’t know where the battle is going to be yet,” Stump said.

In the town of San Juan, just 15 minutes east of McAllen, organizers with La Unión del Pueblo Entero (LUPE), an immigration advocacy group, say they’re preparing in similar ways.

Joaquín García, the organization’s director of community organizing, said he’s noticed more fear and uncertainty in this border community since the election, especially after Trump’s suggestion that entire families could be deported together, regardless of their immigration status. 

“People hear that, and they are in fear. I’ve had people tell me, ‘What’s gonna happen?’ Or ‘I became naturalized a couple of years ago. Are they gonna come after me? Am I still at risk?’" García said. “We’re also telling people, if you’re a U.S. resident, maybe you should consider applying for U.S. citizenship to have a little more protection, but now we don’t even know if that protection will still be something that’s going to safeguard you from being deported to a country that maybe you’ve never been in.'”

García's organization is one of several across the country that are either hosting or planning to launch “know your rights” information sessions for the public, including Siembra NC in North Carolina, Project New Yorker in Queens and the UNLV Immigration Clinic in Nevada. In Kansas City, Missouri, immigration attorneys have begun passing out “red cards” that list residents’ rights should they be approached by immigration officials. 

García said he’s been advising families to keep an easily accessible cache of documents somewhere in their homes in case of a removal order. That file would contain money, evidence that they’ve been living in the U.S. and paying taxes, their birth certificate from their country of origin and — if they have children who are U.S. citizens — power of attorney that allows someone to act on their parents’ behalf in legal matters in case the parents are deported.

That’s exactly the kind of precaution Maria, whose last name is being withheld because of her undocumented immigration status, is working on now.

Maria left her home country 18 years ago, leaving her then-infant son with extended family to earn a living doing farm work in the U.S. Since then, she and her husband had twin daughters, who are now in their teens and are U.S. citizens. She pays LUPE $40 a year for access to legal and other services in Hidalgo County. 

She has been paying attention to the incoming president’s words through news reports and social media.

“Now we are more than scared, we are frightened, tortured, day after day,” she said in Spanish.

She said her family doesn't ask for anything — "we know how to live with very little" — but she has one request to the incoming Trump administration: that her family be allowed to stay together, so her daughters can have a better life in the country where they were born.

Brooklyn Crips gang member killed his leader to avenge pal’s death: feds 

A Brooklyn Crips member was charged Tuesday with a nearly decade-old murder, accused of whacking his gang’s leader to avenge the death of a close friend.
Jason “Twin” Soto, 36, lured Cypress Gangsta Crips leader Shakim Rivera out of a Brooklyn apartment in 2015 and shot him to death at a time when the gang was feuding with a rival Bloods faction and waging an internal battle, according to federal prosecutors.
Soto blamed Rivera for the death of another member of the gang, Demetrius “Duke” Graham, who he thought of as a younger brother, prosecutors said.
Graham was killed on Feb. 19, 2015, by two gunmen his fellow Crips believe were dispatched by Rivera, and that led his underlings to turn on him, considering him a “traitor,” according to court filings.

“This comrade of ours was no longer a friend of ours, and that envy made him a monster,” Soto wrote of Rivera in what the feds describe as an “autobiographical manuscript,” according to court filings.
He allegedly wrote of Graham, “I failed him as a brother, but would never fail him again.”

The day of Graham’s murder, Soto joined a phone call made by his twin brother, who was locked up at Rikers Island, and told him that he planned to kill Rivera. “I’m touching him,” Soto said during the call, while his twin tried to get him to “stop talking” on the recorded line, according to court filings.

Soto got on a bus from Pennsylvania and headed for Brooklyn, the feds allege. On Feb. 22, he lured Rivera out of an East New York apartment to a spot on Bayview Place in Canarsie, and shot him in the back of the head, the feds allege.

“This indictment makes clear that my office and our law enforcement partners are relentless in our pursuit of violent gang members who have committed murders and harmed communities like the Cypress Hills Houses for far too long,” Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said Tuesday.

The feds describe Soto as a key player in the Cypress Gangsta Crips, with a violent past that includes a 2005 shooting and a 2007 armed robbery at a Pennsylvania jewelry store.

A federal investigation into violence in the Cypress Hills Houses in the mid-2010s revealed that his gang, a subset of the Eight Trey Crips, held sway in the “Backside” and “Teamside” parts of the complex on Linden Blvd. and the west end of Sutter Ave., while their Bloods rivals controlled the “Frontside” on the east end of Sutter.

Rivera, for his part, was suspected in the murder of a Bloods member, Rayvon Henriques, in July 2014 as part of the feud.

In his manuscript, the feds allege, Soto described his philosophy about gang life, explaining how being a Crip meant never backing down from a fight or talking to law enforcement — and how a shootout is “one of many ceremonies a youth must go through in the pursuit of manhood.”

Soto pleaded not guilty in Brooklyn Federal Court on Tuesday and was ordered held without bail. His lawyer declined to comment.

 

Brooklyn Crips gang member killed his leader to avenge pal’s death: feds 

A Brooklyn Crips member was charged Tuesday with a nearly decade-old murder, accused of whacking his gang’s leader to avenge the death of a close friend.
Jason “Twin” Soto, 36, lured Cypress Gangsta Crips leader Shakim Rivera out of a Brooklyn apartment in 2015 and shot him to death at a time when the gang was feuding with a rival Bloods faction and waging an internal battle, according to federal prosecutors.
Soto blamed Rivera for the death of another member of the gang, Demetrius “Duke” Graham, who he thought of as a younger brother, prosecutors said.
Graham was killed on Feb. 19, 2015, by two gunmen his fellow Crips believe were dispatched by Rivera, and that led his underlings to turn on him, considering him a “traitor,” according to court filings.

“This comrade of ours was no longer a friend of ours, and that envy made him a monster,” Soto wrote of Rivera in what the feds describe as an “autobiographical manuscript,” according to court filings.
He allegedly wrote of Graham, “I failed him as a brother, but would never fail him again.”

The day of Graham’s murder, Soto joined a phone call made by his twin brother, who was locked up at Rikers Island, and told him that he planned to kill Rivera. “I’m touching him,” Soto said during the call, while his twin tried to get him to “stop talking” on the recorded line, according to court filings.

Soto got on a bus from Pennsylvania and headed for Brooklyn, the feds allege. On Feb. 22, he lured Rivera out of an East New York apartment to a spot on Bayview Place in Canarsie, and shot him in the back of the head, the feds allege.

“This indictment makes clear that my office and our law enforcement partners are relentless in our pursuit of violent gang members who have committed murders and harmed communities like the Cypress Hills Houses for far too long,” Brooklyn U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said Tuesday.

The feds describe Soto as a key player in the Cypress Gangsta Crips, with a violent past that includes a 2005 shooting and a 2007 armed robbery at a Pennsylvania jewelry store.

A federal investigation into violence in the Cypress Hills Houses in the mid-2010s revealed that his gang, a subset of the Eight Trey Crips, held sway in the “Backside” and “Teamside” parts of the complex on Linden Blvd. and the west end of Sutter Ave., while their Bloods rivals controlled the “Frontside” on the east end of Sutter.

Rivera, for his part, was suspected in the murder of a Bloods member, Rayvon Henriques, in July 2014 as part of the feud.

In his manuscript, the feds allege, Soto described his philosophy about gang life, explaining how being a Crip meant never backing down from a fight or talking to law enforcement — and how a shootout is “one of many ceremonies a youth must go through in the pursuit of manhood.”

Soto pleaded not guilty in Brooklyn Federal Court on Tuesday and was ordered held without bail. His lawyer declined to comment.

 

 A GOP-led subcommittee's interim report says the FBI should investigate Cheney, a former House Republican lawmaker, over her involvement in the Jan. 6 select committee.

Liz Cheney said the Republican allegations that she may have broken the law in her work on the Jan. 6 committee were fabrications and a "defamatory" effort to cover up Donald Trump's actions.Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images file

WASHINGTON — A Republican chairman said Tuesday that the FBI should investigate former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., over her involvement in the probe from the last Congress of the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.

"Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation," said an interim report released by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who chairs the House Administration's oversight subcommittee, which investigated the Jan. 6 select committee.

The report alleged Republicans found evidence showing Cheney "tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without her attorney's knowledge."

"This secret communication with a witness is improper," the report said.

In addition, the report said the FBI should investigate Cheney for allegedly violating a law that prohibits any person from procuring another person to commit perjury. which Republicans have accused Hutchinson of doing in her testimony to the committee.

The report accused Cheney of helping Hutchinson attain new counsel; while the report alleges they spoke directly to each other without a lawyer's knowledge, it indicated Republicans don't seem to know what they discussed.

Cheney said in a statement in response to the report that Jan. 6 showed Trump for who he really is, "a cruel and vindictive man who allowed violent attacks to continue against our Capitol and law enforcement officers while he watched television and refused for hours to instruct his supporters to stand down and leave."

The select committee's 10 public hearings and final report featured numerous Republican witnesses, including many senior officials from the Trump White House, campaign and administration, Cheney noted in the statement. Their testimony was laid out in thousands of pages of transcripts and a "highly detailed and meticulously sourced" 800-page report that were made public and whose conclusions the Department of Justice had also reached in a separate investigation, she said.

Loudermilk's interim report "intentionally disregards the truth and the Select Committee's tremendous weight of evidence, and instead fabricates lies and defamatory allegations in an attempt to cover up what Donald Trump did," she alleged. "Their allegations do not reflect a review of the actual evidence, and are a malicious and cowardly assault on the truth."

President-elect Donald Trump recently suggested in an exclusive interview with NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that the members of the Jan. 6 panel should be imprisoned. Those former members, including its Democratic chairman, have said the committee did nothing wrong and did not violate the law.

Hutchinson was considered a star witness for the Jan. 6 committee which was formed in the last Congress under the House Democratic majority and included two Republicans: Cheney, who was the vice chair, and then-Rep. Adam Kinzinger, of Illinois. Hutchinson, a close aide to Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified both privately and publicly to the committee about her knowledge of the lead-up Jan. 6 and what unfolded that day.

Hutchinson testified that she was told by White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato that after Trump's "Stop the Steal" rally at the White House ellipse, Trump insisted to the Secret Service that he go to the Capitol where he had encouraged his supporters to go afterward. Hutchinson testified that she was told Trump cursed at his security guards after being told they couldn't go to the Capitol, grabbed for the steering wheel of his SUV from the back seat, and then reached for the "clavicles" of Bobby Engel, Trump's head of security, who eventually relayed his account to Ornato.

While Republicans say there have been witnesses who have disputed Hutchinson's account, it has also been corroborated by others. Ornato later told the committee that he did not recall the conversation she said they had with Engel.

A lawyer who has represented Hutchinson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Her attorneys previously said in a statement that she stood by her testimony to the Jan. 6 committee.

 A GOP-led subcommittee's interim report says the FBI should investigate Cheney, a former House Republican lawmaker, over her involvement in the Jan. 6 select committee.

Liz Cheney said the Republican allegations that she may have broken the law in her work on the Jan. 6 committee were fabrications and a "defamatory" effort to cover up Donald Trump's actions.Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images file

WASHINGTON — A Republican chairman said Tuesday that the FBI should investigate former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., over her involvement in the probe from the last Congress of the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol.

"Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation," said an interim report released by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who chairs the House Administration's oversight subcommittee, which investigated the Jan. 6 select committee.

The report alleged Republicans found evidence showing Cheney "tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by secretly communicating with Hutchinson without her attorney's knowledge."

"This secret communication with a witness is improper," the report said.

In addition, the report said the FBI should investigate Cheney for allegedly violating a law that prohibits any person from procuring another person to commit perjury. which Republicans have accused Hutchinson of doing in her testimony to the committee.

The report accused Cheney of helping Hutchinson attain new counsel; while the report alleges they spoke directly to each other without a lawyer's knowledge, it indicated Republicans don't seem to know what they discussed.

Cheney said in a statement in response to the report that Jan. 6 showed Trump for who he really is, "a cruel and vindictive man who allowed violent attacks to continue against our Capitol and law enforcement officers while he watched television and refused for hours to instruct his supporters to stand down and leave."

The select committee's 10 public hearings and final report featured numerous Republican witnesses, including many senior officials from the Trump White House, campaign and administration, Cheney noted in the statement. Their testimony was laid out in thousands of pages of transcripts and a "highly detailed and meticulously sourced" 800-page report that were made public and whose conclusions the Department of Justice had also reached in a separate investigation, she said.

Loudermilk's interim report "intentionally disregards the truth and the Select Committee's tremendous weight of evidence, and instead fabricates lies and defamatory allegations in an attempt to cover up what Donald Trump did," she alleged. "Their allegations do not reflect a review of the actual evidence, and are a malicious and cowardly assault on the truth."

President-elect Donald Trump recently suggested in an exclusive interview with NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that the members of the Jan. 6 panel should be imprisoned. Those former members, including its Democratic chairman, have said the committee did nothing wrong and did not violate the law.

Hutchinson was considered a star witness for the Jan. 6 committee which was formed in the last Congress under the House Democratic majority and included two Republicans: Cheney, who was the vice chair, and then-Rep. Adam Kinzinger, of Illinois. Hutchinson, a close aide to Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified both privately and publicly to the committee about her knowledge of the lead-up Jan. 6 and what unfolded that day.

Hutchinson testified that she was told by White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato that after Trump's "Stop the Steal" rally at the White House ellipse, Trump insisted to the Secret Service that he go to the Capitol where he had encouraged his supporters to go afterward. Hutchinson testified that she was told Trump cursed at his security guards after being told they couldn't go to the Capitol, grabbed for the steering wheel of his SUV from the back seat, and then reached for the "clavicles" of Bobby Engel, Trump's head of security, who eventually relayed his account to Ornato.

While Republicans say there have been witnesses who have disputed Hutchinson's account, it has also been corroborated by others. Ornato later told the committee that he did not recall the conversation she said they had with Engel.

A lawyer who has represented Hutchinson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Her attorneys previously said in a statement that she stood by her testimony to the Jan. 6 committee.